Did dinosaurs look less scary than we have imagined?

A new study suggests that lips may have covered the sharp fangs that have come to be so characteristic of some dinosaurs. 

|
Danielle Default
A theropod dinosaur feeding, showing the teeth, lips, and teeth covered mostly by gingiva inside the mouth.

It turns out dinosaurs might not have been the fang-bearing menaces movies like Jurassic Park have made them out to be, thanks to a new study suggesting that dinosaurs might have had lips covering their teeth.

"In popular culture, we imagine dinosaurs as more ferocious-looking, but that is not the case," University of Toronto vertebrate paleontologist Robert Reisz, who carried out the study, said in a press release.

Dr. Reisz looked at today's reptilian predators, such as monitor lizards and crocodiles, for hints at what theropod – or "beast footed" – dinosaurs might have looked like. Crocodiles have exposed teeth and no lips, similar to the common perceptions of the dinosaur, while monitor lizards have lips that conceal their teeth, similar to how popular media portrays the velociraptor.

Reisz explains that lips protect the teeth by keeping them in a moist environment so they don't dry out. "We propose that this requirement of hydration is not possible to maintain if the tooth is exposed permanently," he told CNN.

Reptiles like monitor lizards need lips because they live on dry land, while crocodiles don't need lips because they spend time in water, so "the comparison is flawed," according to Reisz.

Therefore, he concluded that the land-roaming dinosaur likely would have had lips as well, like the monitor lizard. "It's also important to remember that teeth would have been partially covered by gums. It we look at where the enamel stops, we can see that a substantial portion of the teeth would be hidden in the gums," said Reisz, adding that on a living animal, the teeth would have therefore appeared smaller.  

Reisz and his colleague Derek Larson tested the theory by analyzing tusks, terrestrial mammals' exposed teeth that don't have enamel, and comparing them to theropod dinosaurs' teeth, which have well-preserved enamel. Their findings suggest that theropod teeth were not permanently exposed, but rather covered by lips.

"The relationship between teeth and their surrounding tissues, both hard and soft, is very interesting, and we have extended it to an area that has bothered me for so long, that the large theropod dinosaurs are depicted with their teeth sticking out," Reisz tells The Christian Science Monitor in an email. "The normal pattern for living animals that live on land is to have the teeth covered by tissue, essentially lip-like structures, whether they are terrestrial amphibians, lizards, snakes, or mammals (birds and turtles do not have teeth)." All dinosaurs likely had teeth covered by lips, he adds. 

The research was presented on May 20 at the Canadian Society of Vertebrate Paleontology at the University of Toronto, Mississauga.

"This is ongoing research," writes Reisz, who says he has been drawing comparisons to living animals' teeth for several years. "[I] hope to complete and publish on it soon."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Did dinosaurs look less scary than we have imagined?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2016/0523/Did-dinosaurs-look-less-scary-than-we-have-imagined
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe