4 writers who take chances with their novels

These four writers have all crafted books utterly different from anything else you've read.

4. 'Fugitive Pieces,' by Ann Michaels

Faulkner claims that every novelist is a failed poet. Wrong. And Anne Michaels’ "Fugitive Pieces" dismisses this claim as bunk by the end of the first chapter – indeed the first page. Michaels, an already successful poet, turned from poetry to write her first novel, "Fugitive Pieces," but brought with her a poet’s sensibilities and rhythmic elegance.

Her prose sings with grace.

"Fugitive Pieces" recounts the story of a Jewish boy, Jakob, who is rescued from a Polish forest during the Holocaust by Athos, a Greek scholar, after Jakob’s parents and sister are murdered – a fate he himself narrowly escapes by cramming his seven-year-old body into a crawlspace. Taken by Athos to the island of Zakynthos, Jakob begins the arduous process of learning to grieve and live simultaneously.  Surrounded by the Greek landscape of ocean and steep craggy hillsides and comforted by Athos’s world of geology, botany, astronomy, and classical poetry, Jakob soaks up knowledge while mourning for his dead parents and missing sister.

We follow Jakob and Athos’ journey from their hilltop refuge on Zakynthos, to mainland Athens, to Canadian Toronto.  And simultaneously, we follow Jakob’s journey to create meaning – beauty – out of his own abysmal history and the more hopeful, steady history of the world itself.

4 of 4

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.