8 new baseball books for Opening Day and beyond

Play ball! As the season begins, here are some baseball titles to check out.

5. "Red Sox Nation: The Rich and Colorful History of the Boston Red Sox," by Peter Golenbock

Author Peter Golenbock weaves together the history of the Red Sox largely by relying on the words of the players, fans, and sportswriters who lived it. That he spends 69 chapters and 600 pages to do it tells you something about how much there is to impart about this storied franchise and the appetite of Red Sox fans to devour it. Not surprisingly, a fair amount of ink is devoted to Ted Williams and his nearly unparalleled brilliance as a hitter, including his pursuit of a .400 batting average.

Here’s an excerpt from “Red Sox Nation”: 

“It was Sunday, September 28, 1941, only nine weeks before Pearl Harbor and war. The Red Sox were in Philadelphia to play a doubleheader against the Athletics. These were the final two games of the season. Ted [Williams] was batting .39955. For the first time since July, Ted was hitting under .400 and yet, rounded out, he was still at .400. If he sat out the two games, he would stand with the game’s twentieth-century legends who had hit .400: Napoleon Lajoie, Rogers Hornsby, George Sisler, Ty Cobb, “Shoeless” Joe Jackson, Harry Heilmann, and Bill Terry. Manager Joe Cronin gave Williams the opportunity to sit out and protect the average.

“Ted chose to play. He remembered that Jimmie Foxx had sat out the final day in his race with Buddy Myer and lost the batting championship when Myer had gotten two hits. Williams didn’t want to hit .400 as a coward.”

5 of 8

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.