Young adults more likely to read than those who are 30 and up, says Pew report

Study participants between the ages of 16 and 29 were more likely to have read a book in the last year than those 30 and older, but young adults are less likely to value the place of a library in a community.

|
Melanie Stetson Freeman
Naperville North High School senior John Baird lies on the library floor with a book of quotations doing research for English class in 2000.

According to a new Pew study, those under 30 are still picking up books – and doing so more often than older adults.

88 percent of Americans between the ages of 16 and 29 that were involved in the study said they have read a book in the last 12 months, compared to 79 percent of adults 30 and older. 

In addition, study participants who are under 30 and those who are that age and above were almost equally likely to have used a library or bookmobile in the last year at the time of the study, with 50 percent of those under 30 saying they had done so and 47 percent of those 30 and above having used one. Younger participants were more likely to have used the website for a library within that past year, with 36 percent having done so. 28 percent of those 30 and over said they had used the site. 

However, 36 percent of those between 16 and 29 responded that they “know little or nothing about the local library’s services” and only 19 percent of that group said they would be “major[ly] impact[ed]” by their local library closing as opposed to 32 percent of those 30 and over responding in that way. They were also less likely to agree that “it would have a major impact on their community,” with 51 percent of the younger generation agreeing as opposed to 67 percent of those who are 30 and older. 

The report also noted that those under 30 often have different routines based on their age. “There are actually three different ‘generations’ of younger Americans with distinct book reading habits, library usage patterns, and attitudes about libraries,” the report read. “One ‘generation’ is comprised of high schoolers (ages 16-17); another is college-aged (18-24), though many do not attend college; and a third generation is 25-29.”

Of those “generations,” the Pew Report noted that those who are 16 and 17 “are more likely to read (particularly print books), more likely to read for work or school, and more likely to use the library for books and research than older age groups. They are the only age group more likely to borrow most of the books they read instead of purchasing them,” though they were less likely to agree with the value of a library in a community and to say they would be impacted by a library closing. Those who are between 18 and 24 “are less likely to use public libraries than many other age groups… They are more likely to purchase most of the books they read than borrow them” and those between 25 and 29 “are less likely than college-aged adults to have read a book in the past year… library users in this group are less likely than younger patrons to say their library use has decreased, and they are much more likely to say that various library services are very important to them and their family.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Young adults more likely to read than those who are 30 and up, says Pew report
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Books/chapter-and-verse/2014/0912/Young-adults-more-likely-to-read-than-those-who-are-30-and-up-says-Pew-report
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe