Peyton Manning retiring? He has good years left.

Peyton Manning's future is still in question. But if the Colts don't want him, other teams will gladly take Peyton Manning.

|
Phelan M. Ebenhack/AP/FIle
Peyton Manning watches from the sideline during the second half of an NFL football game against the Jacksonville Jaguars. The Colts' star quarterback may be let go, but at 35, he could still be a powerful weapon on another team.

Rob Lowe didn’t know anything about Peyton Manning, it turns out. And though the speculation on the Colt’s fate will build in the coming weeks, it's quite likely we won’t know anything for a while, either. So let’s all take a Twitter break and examine the factors at play:

It all hinges on his health. If the future Hall of Famer continues to have trouble with his neck, on which he had three surgeries this year, then yes, he might call it quits, capping a career that includes eight Pro Bowl appearances, four NFL MVP awards, a Super Bowl ring, and a guest voice appearance on “The Simpsons.”

It’s a career that leaves little to be desired, and if Manning walked away now, he’d be quitting on top.

His exit from the pros, too, would be perversely welcome news for the Colts organization. The team is in the middle of an expansive reorganization. In the wake of Manning’s season-canceling neck trouble, the Colts failed to find an adequate replacement at quarterback and finished the season 2-14. In the past few weeks, Vice Chairman Bill Polian (the man responsible for picking Manning first overall in the 1998 NFL Draft), General Manager Chris Polian, and head coach Jim Caldwell have all been sacked.

The prevailing wisdom suggests that Manning will probably be next. His exit would make room for the Colts to draft  Stanford quarterback Andrew Luck, the most highly coveted quarterback prospect in years.

Ironically, Manning’s injury, and the Colts’ subsequent bumbling season, unmasked flaws in the team that his masterful play and management had been covering up for years. And those flaws will probably cost him his job.

Manning’s retirement would save the Colts front office the inevitable backlash of forcing out the greatest player in their history. It would also save them the $27 million due to Manning by March, if they don’t cut him loose. Furthermore, they’d be spared the awkwardness (and potential embarrassment) of facing him as a quarterback for another team.

Manning is 35 years old – well into elder statesman territory in the NFL. But he’s still an elite quarterback, and likely one with a few good years left in him. For one, he’s a pocket passer who takes relatively few hits. If his neck issues clear up, he has a lower chance of getting injured than your average player (he played 208 consecutive games over 12 years before his injury, second only to Brett Favre). Even at 35, he’d be a prize at quarterback for a slew of NFL teams. The New York Jets and Washington Redskins have already expressed interest.

Furthermore, 35 isn’t so old for NFL quarterback these days, especially pocket guys like Manning. Brett Favre played until he was literally a grandpa, at 41. Kurt Warner led the Arizona Cardinals to a Super Bowl at age 37, and Steve Young played until 38. The NFL Hall of Fame website list dozens of players who remained active well into their forties. The oldest? George Blanda, the Raiders quarterback/kicker who played until the ripe old  age of 48.

Yes, he’d be well past his peak. But a past-peak Peyton Manning is still incredibly dangerous.  Indianapolis can’t afford to keep him, especially if they need to rebuild. But other teams may not be able to afford to pass him up.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Peyton Manning retiring? He has good years left.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2012/0121/Peyton-Manning-retiring-He-has-good-years-left
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe