Kodak bankruptcy: Can 'failed company' find new Kodak moment?

Kodak: Bankruptcy Judge Allan Gropper approves Kodak's plan to emerge from bankruptcy. Kodak is trying to recreate itself as a much smaller company focused on printing.

|
David Duprey/AP/File
A Kodak factory in Rochester, N.Y. On Tuesday, Aug. 20, a federal judge approved the Kodak bankruptcy plan. The company plans to emerge from bankruptcy protection on Sept. 3, paving the way for it to refocus on commercial and packaging printing.

Kodak doesn't look a whole lot like it did when it filed for bankruptcy protection last year, but its executives and investors are hoping for a picture-perfect future.

Many of its products and services are gone, including the camera-making business that made it famous more than a century ago. Also gone are scores of workers, manufacturing facilities, supply contracts and millions of dollars in investments.

On Tuesday, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Allan Gropper approved the Kodak bankruptcy plan, paving the way for it to recreate itself as a new, much smaller company focused on commercial and packaging printing.

Kodak said it hopes to emerge from bankruptcy protection as early as Sept. 3.

"They still have people with immense skill and who know how to win," said Mark Zupan, dean of the business school at the University of Rochester, near Kodak's headquarters. "But it's also a team that has gone through hell for the last 10 to 20 years. It has been like constant water torture."

Founded by George Eastman in 1880, Eastman Kodak Co. is credited with popularizing photography at the start of the 20th century and was known all over the world for its Brownie and Instamatic cameras and its yellow-and-red film boxes. It was first brought down by Japanese competition and then an inability to keep pace with the shift from film to digital technology.

"Up until around 2005, Kodak was one of the most recognizable brands in the world, and that's now gone," said Robert Burley, a photography professor at Ryerson University in Toronto. "It's only real brand recognition these days is as a failed company that was unable to make the transition from the 20th century to the 21st century. To some degree, they have become a poster child for a company that could not keep up with technology."

Kodak filed for bankruptcy protection last year after struggling with increasing competition, continuing growth in digital photography, and growing debt. Since its filing, Kodak has sold off many of its businesses and patents, while shutting down the camera manufacturing unit that first made it famous.

"Kodak is a different company than the one in the popular imagination and very different from the one that filed for bankruptcy," Kodak attorney Andrew Dietderich told the court at the start of Tuesday's hearing.

In making his ruling, Gropper noted that his approval of the plan will result in the loss of retirement and health care benefits for many former workers, while many of the company's investors will recoup just pennies on the dollar.

"So at a time of admitted tragedy, let us take a moment to dwell on the future and hope that Kodak will be successful," Gropper said.

Kodak Chairman and CEO Antonio Perez said that with the ruling, the company is now poised to become a leader in the commercial imaging industry, providing professional services such as commercial printing, packaging and film for motion pictures.

Zupan said the company also has been developing an alternative for a key composite used in the production of touch-screen display screens.

The connection with consumers is gone, though. "Kodak no longer will have any of the core businesses that once defined it," Burley said.

Earlier this year, the company said it would sell its personalized and document-imaging businesses to its U.K. pension plan for $650 million as part of a deal that settles $2.8 billion in claims that the retirement fund had sought from the photography pioneer.

It also sold its document imaging assets, digital imaging patents, and online photo service, while shutting down other divisions.

Last week, a majority of the company's creditors voted to approve its plan to emerge. But some retirees, shareholders, and other parties objected to it.

Although some shareholders argued that they should be entitled for something in exchange for their stock, Gropper said he ruled at a previous hearing that they weren't. He noted that the company's creditors will only receive 4 cents or 5 cents on the dollar for their investments and that they're entitled to be paid before shareholders are. Generally, holders of common stock do not receive anything for their shares when a company emerges from Chapter 11.

The U.S. Trustee also filed an objection challenging the legality of hefty cash and stock bonuses that Kodak executives are expected to receive when the Rochester, N.Y., company exits from bankruptcy protection.

AP Technology Writer Michael Liedtke in San Francisco contributed to this story.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Kodak bankruptcy: Can 'failed company' find new Kodak moment?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/Latest-News-Wires/2013/0820/Kodak-bankruptcy-Can-failed-company-find-new-Kodak-moment
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe