Amtrak: Just how bad is America’s infrastructure?

Last week’s Amtrak derailment has brought renewed attention and concern about the nation’s infrastructure, and not just its rail lines. A new report says that nearly all congressional districts (430 of 435) have 'structurally deficient' bridges.

|
Julio Cortez/AP
New rail lines are stacked up in an area near the site where a deadly train derailment occurred last week in Philadelphia. Amtrak is working to restore Northeast Corridor rail service between New York City and Philadelphia.

In some ways, infrastructure upkeep – roads, bridges, rail lines, and all the other systems that keep us and the economy moving – is like dental flossing. Everyone says it’s important, but it’s not very exciting or (to most of us) even interesting.

But when things go wrong – like last week’s deadly Amtrak derailment – then it becomes the focus of public and political attention.

Investigators are methodically looking for the reason or reasons why Train 188 suddenly accelerated to more than 100 miles an hour as it approached a 50 mile-per-hour curve near Philadelphia, jumping the tracks and ending in a twisted jumble of cars that killed eight passengers and injured more than 200.

Authorities were quick to order improvements to the rail line’s infrastructure, including immediate implementation of the Positive Train Control System, which can automatically slow or stop a train, for northbound trains (already in place for southbound trains); analyzing the risks in all curves along the Northeast Corridor and implementing the appropriate technology “immediately”; and increasing wayside signage alerting engineers and conductors of the maximum authorized speed throughout the corridor.

In a piece headlined “America's premier rail superhighway is slowly falling apart,” the Associated Press reports that “the rails of the Northeast Corridor are decaying, increasingly strained – and moving more people than ever around the nation's most densely populated region.”

“The trains that link global centers of learning, finance and power on the East Coast lumber through tunnels dug just after the Civil War, and cross century-old bridges that sometimes jam when they swing open to let tugboats pass,” according to the AP. “Hundreds of miles of overhead wires that deliver power to locomotives were hung during the Great Depression…. By one estimate, it would take $21 billion just to replace parts still in use beyond their intended lives.”

"The stakes are enormous," Amtrak's president, Joseph Boardman, warned in his 2015 request to Congress for funding. He said the corridor was experiencing a "crisis brought on by decades of chronic underfunding."

It’s not just the nation’s rail system.

Using US Department of Transportation figures, the data-analytics company Transit Labs reported last week that nearly all congressional districts (430 of 435) have “structurally deficient” bridges. Fifty congressional districts have more than 300 structurally deficient bridges, and another 133 districts have 80-300 such bridges, according to this calculation.

(Federal law requires states to inspect their bridges at least 20 feet long every two years. Bridges are rated from 0-9, with 9 being the best. Federal guidelines classify bridges as “structurally deficient” if one of three components holding up the bridge – deck, superstructure, or substructure – is given a 4 or less.)

In congressional testimony last February regarding the Surface Transportation Reauthorization Bill, Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx warned that investment in the nation’s transportation network “fails to keep pace with our growing economy and population.”

“The costs of inadequate infrastructure investment are exhibited all around us,” Secretary Foxx said. “Americans spend 5.5 billion hours in traffic each year, costing families more than $120 billion in extra fuel and lost time. American businesses pay $27 billion a year in extra freight transportation costs, increasing shipping delays and raising prices on everyday products. Also, 65 percent of our Nation’s roads are in less than good condition; one in four bridges require significant repair or can’t handle current traffic demands and 45 percent of Americans lack access to basic transit services. Underinvestment impacts safety too. There were over 32,000 highway traffic fatalities in 2013, and roadway conditions are a significant factor in approximately one-third of them.”

It’s a theme the White House has been emphasizing as well.

“Twenty-first-century businesses need 21st-century infrastructure: modern ports, and stronger bridges, faster trains and the fastest Internet,” Mr. Obama said in his State of the Union address in January. “Let’s do it. Let’s get it done.”

President Obama’s proposed budget includes a six-year, $478 billion infrastructure plan reflecting a 33 percent increase in new public works projects to be paid for by new taxes on overseas earning by American companies.

Obama returned to this theme in his initial comments about last week’s Amtrak accident

"Until we know for certain what caused this tragedy, I just want to reiterate what I have already said: That we are a growing country, with a growing economy," Obama said at a Camp David press conference two days after the derailment. "We need to invest in the infrastructure that keeps us that way and not just when something bad happens like a bridge collapse or a train derailment but all the time. That's what great nations do."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Amtrak: Just how bad is America’s infrastructure?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2015/0517/Amtrak-Just-how-bad-is-America-s-infrastructure
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe