Who could be the next Ted Cruz? Top 10 tea party primaries of 2014.

Who are the tea party movement's top candidates in 2014, and what are their prospects? Here's a look:

4. Kansas: Milton Wolf vs. Pat Roberts

John Hanna/AP/File
Milton Wolf answers questions from reporters about his campaign for the US Senate in Topeka, Kan., earlier this year.

Early in the cycle, Sen. Pat Roberts (R) of Kansas looked vulnerable. In a New York Times interview, he admitted that he pays rent to stay with supporters when he visits his home state, and that he registered to vote at his friends’ address the day before his primary opponent got into the race. 

Senator Roberts looked set to become the next Richard Lugar, the Indiana senator who lost touch with his home state and lost the 2012 GOP primary to a tea party insurgent. Roberts’s opponent, Milton Wolf, is a young, telegenic doctor and tea party activist, and seemed a strong challenger to the three-term incumbent. Dr. Wolf is backed by the Senate Conservatives Fund and pulls no rhetorical punches: He has compared Mr. Obama, his distant cousin, to Hitler and Mussolini.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  

Enter social media. In February, the Topeka Capital-Journal broke a story about Wolf’s disabled Facebook page, where he had posted gruesome X-ray images and added macabre jokes and commentary.  

In a statement, Wolf admitted to “mistakes," but his candidacy is on life support. A Public Policy Poll taken in February showed Roberts at 49 percent and Wolf at 23 percent.

Still, Wolf remains in the hunt. On April 16, he released a TV ad that hits Roberts for spending nearly five decades in Washington.

Another wrinkle is that outgoing Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius – a former two-term Democratic governor of Kansas – is reportedly thinking of getting into the race. That raises the stakes for the GOP primary. Secretary Sebelius has until June 2 to decide, the filing deadline for the Aug. 5 primaries.  

4 of 10

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.