Rio+20: 5 key takeaways

Here are some of the promising developments and bigger disappointments of the Rio+20 global sustainability conference, which ends today.

Green what?

And what is the green economy anyway? One of the big disappointments of the conference has been its inability to get any closer to defining what this term du jour even means. It's hard to define but, as Deutz puts it – citing the famous US Supreme Court case on pornography – “I know it when I see it.”

Part of the issue of defining a green economy in more specificity, however, is that there is not a one-size-fits-all for each country. And Mr. Olivier, in the Guardian post, says that the “green economy idea has not died, and to quote the Venezuelan delegation during the final text release: 'Green economy has changed from something that is being imposed, to something we own.'”

Still there is a great deal of misunderstanding and mistrust surrounding the issue. The global South, in particular, says Shultz, worries that the notion is merely a way to co-opt the natural resources of the developing world. “There is a fight there,” he says. “We need to define what it ought to be, and what it ought not to be.”

5 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.