Costa Concordia: Did the captain break any law in abandoning ship?

4. Are cruise boat safety regulations going to change?

Some observers suggest that the Costa Concordia accident will be an impetus to overhaul cruise ship standards and safety regulations. 

One issue is the sheer size of cruise boats.

International standards set out by the IMO require that all passengers and crew evacuate a ship within 30 minutes in the case of an emergency, says Palmiotti.  But on a boat like the Costa Concordia with 4,000 passengers and likely a 1,500-person crew, the 30-minute rule is one example of an out-of-date regulation.

"Ships have been getting bigger faster than our ability to keep up,” he argues.

“To have the perfect evacuation, everyone has to do exactly what is expected of them,” Palmiotti adds.  “Which is hard to do when a vessel is heeled over. In essence, you can’t be having an emergency to evacuate safely [in that time frame].”

Another rule that may come under scrutiny is the 24-hour window allotted by the IMO for drilling passengers in boat safety and evacuation protocols.  The most dangerous night on a cruise ship is the first night out, says Palmiotti. He notes that Concordia planned to conduct its safety drill the next morning – something that was within the legal time frame.

But, he says, “you have 4,000 people new to the ship.  They don’t know where they’re going or how to get anywhere. Regulations like this seem to be reactive, not proactive.”

Part of the need to update regulations, Palmiotti says, is driven by the fact that they are not just vehicles for moving from Point A to Point B, implying additional duties and priorities for staff. “Many people don’t see [cruise boats] as ships but hotels and entertainment centers.”

The shipmaster’s duties are thus quite different from those of a cargo boat captain.  “What they’re selling is this experience … of showing up in different places every day. It’s now about entertainment” on top of standard navigational and safety duties, Palmiotti says.

Part of Captain Schettino’s job, particularly on the first night out of port, likely involved dining and visiting with passengers, says Palmiotti. “So much of [being] the cruise ship captain is being a part of the show,” he says. 

4 of 4

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.