Why Justice Department appeal on morning-after pill is ironic
In 2011, the Health and Human Services secretary overruled the FDA on its determination that there should be no age restrictions on buying morning-after pills. Now Justice is saying that FDA should be setting the rules, not a federal judge.
Teva Women's Health/AP
The Justice Department‚Äôs decision to appeal a federal judge‚Äôs order removing age restrictions on buying morning-after pills keeps the politically charged issue of emergency contraception in the spotlight.
The decision, announced Wednesday night, does not affect the Food and Drug Administration‚Äôs rule announced Tuesday that lowers the age limit on the purchase of the most widely known morning-after pill by people as young as 15 without prescription.
The new age limit on Plan B One-Step, down from 17, goes into effect immediately.
In federal court, the debate centers on who determines the rules regarding availability of a medication, including whether there should be any age limit at all. In a letter to District Judge Edward Korman of New York, US Attorney Loretta Lynch said he had overstepped his authority.
‚ÄúThe public properly relies upon FDA classification of drugs as nonprescription as a reflection of the agency‚Äôs judgment regarding the safety and proper use of a drug without a doctor‚Äôs prescription,‚ÄĚ Ms. Lynch wrote, according to USA Today. ‚ÄúThe public interest will not be served by reclassification of drugs as nonprescription by order of a court, without appropriate agency decisionmaking procedures being followed.‚ÄĚ
The irony in her statement is that the FDA had determined in 2011 that age restrictions on availability of the morning-after pill were unnecessary, based on scientific research ‚Äď a conclusion cited by Judge Korman in his April 5 ruling. But in December 2011, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius overruled the agency and barred the drug‚Äôs sale to girls under age 17, citing a lack of evidence it was safe. On Tuesday, the FDA announced that it had approved over-the-counter sale of one type of pill, Plan B One-Step, to people aged 15 and older.
It was that original determination by the FDA, back in 2011, that formed the basis of Judge Korman‚Äôs ruling. In his decision, he blamed presidential politics for Secretary Sebelius‚Äôs unprecedented step of overruling the FDA.
‚ÄúThe motivation for the secretary‚Äôs action was obviously political,‚ÄĚ the judge wrote. ‚ÄúIt was an election year decision that many public health experts saw as a politically motivated effort to avoid riling religious groups and others opposed to making birth control available to girls.‚ÄĚ
President Obama won reelection, but the politics of the morning-after pill are still very much alive. The Justice Department decision to appeal Korman‚Äôs ruling ‚Äď and request an injunction preventing it from taking effect ‚Äď met with immediate response from interest groups.
The anti-abortion Susan B. Anthony List applauded the Obama administration‚Äôs decision to appeal Korman‚Äôs ruling, while reinforcing its opposition to the FDA‚Äôs new rule. ¬†
"Whether they are 15 or 17, teens need the protection and support that comes with parental and doctor involvement," SBA List President Marjorie Dannenfelser said in a statement.
The Planned Parenthood Federation of America reaffirmed its position that the morning-after pill should be available to people of all ages.
‚ÄúAge barriers to emergency contraception are not supported by science, and they should be eliminated,‚ÄĚ federation president Cecile Richards said in a statement.¬†