How to rescue South Sudan

President Obama helped create the new country of South Sudan, and now he’s trying to save it from a violent civil war. He and others must first focus on building national identity and social trust.

|
AP Photo
President Barack Obama speaks during a meeting on South Sudan with leaders from Kenya, Sudan, Ethiopia, the African Union, and Uganda July 27, 2015, in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

During his first term in office, one of President Obama’s proudest moments was his role in the creation of the world’s newest nation. South Sudan was born in 2011 in northeast Africa to end a long civil war in Sudan. Yet ever since a civil war erupted in South Sudan itself in 2013, Mr. Obama has been on a rescue mission. His quest is a tale about the need to first weave a country together with a common identity before anything else.

On Monday during a trip to Africa, Obama put his legacy on the line by personally negotiating with top leaders of the neighboring states of Uganda, Ethiopia, and Sudan to encourage them to help end the conflict. The United States and the United Nations can do only so much in a situation that requires neighborly pressure to resolve.

The war started with a political clash between President Salva Kiir and his former vice president, Riek Machar. It has since opened ethnic fault lines, mostly pitting Nuers against Dinkas. Tens of thousands of people have been killed with more than 2 million forced from their homes. The country’s abundant oil resources have helped fuel the conflict.

The basic problem is that this country of 11 million was put together with many of the right elements of a state, such as a legislature, a bureaucracy, and a budget largely derived from oil exports, but without a cohesive narrative about national identity. The one big unifier had been opposition to rule by the Arab-dominated government in Sudan’s capital, Khartoum. After independence, the leaders of South Sudan as well as its backers such as the US should have put more effort in building trust and creating shared bonds.

“Helping groups inside states move beyond ... zero-sum thinking to accepting a shared national narrative is especially hard,” said UN Undersecretary-General for Political Affairs Jeffrey Feltman in a recent speech. To enable a society to heal after a conflict, he said, political groups must reconcile competing visions of identity and history. It is easier to separate armies, tend to the needy, and rebuild roads and ministries. But building respect at all levels of society is the main route to peace and security.

“We need to find ways in our work in the aftermath of conflict to break the vicious cycle of divided communities when the hatred and sense of victimhood are most pronounced and palpable,” Mr. Feltman said. He cites post-apartheid South Africa as a good example of a country that used a reconciliation process to establish a forward-looking national identity.

South Sudan’s competing factions have been given a deadline of Aug. 17 to accept a peace deal. Otherwise, the US and other countries might impose an arms embargo and other sanctions. Yet even if a peace pact is inked, the real work lies in creating social bonds and recognizing a common future. Obama’s legacy in Africa depends on it.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to How to rescue South Sudan
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2015/0727/How-to-rescue-South-Sudan
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe