Snoozing through late-night TV

Many younger viewers, a coveted demographic in TV, are ignoring such late-night staples as 'The Tonight Show.' Will Jimmy Fallon taking over for Jay Leno and Seth Meyers arriving on the scene make a difference?

|
Chris Pizzello/AP/File
Jimmy Fallon (l.) and Seth Meyers at the 63rd Primetime Emmy Awards in Los Angeles, Sept. 18, 2011. With Fallon taking over 'The Tonight Show' for Jay Leno, Meyers of 'Saturday Night Live' will host 'Late Night.'

It’s nearly time to crown the new king of the “The Tonight Show.” In early 2014, Jay Leno will hand the reins of NBC’s legendary late-night talk show to Jimmy Fallon, currently the host of NBC’s “Late Night.” With Mr. Fallon taking over “Tonight,” Seth Meyers of “Saturday Night Live” will host “Late Night,” and ABC plans to move Jimmy Kimmel’s time slot up half an hour to compete directly with Fallon.

But will these shifts make a difference among 18-to-49-year-olds, the coveted demographic that catapulted “The Daily Show” and “The Colbert Report” to success?

Though the changes are still months away, entertainment writers are already abuzz with speculation.

According to Nielsen ratings, Mr. Leno wiped the floor with his late-night competitors in the second quarter of this year, attracting an average of 3.57 million viewers per night, while Fallon averaged 1.78 million. David Letterman and Mr. Kimmel lagged with an average of 750,000 and 1 million viewers, respectively.

Time slots, ratings, Jimmy versus Jimmy; the bigger question might be, do viewers really care about any of it?

“Everyone is talking about all these changes in ‘Late Night,’ and my reaction is, ‘So what?’” says Steve Johnson, longtime TV critic and arts writer for the Chicago Tribune. “More and more every year I pay attention less and less.”

Among 18-to-49-year-olds, “The Daily Show” is nearly neck and neck with “The Tonight Show,” with 1.11 million viewers to Leno’s 1.08 million. But in the younger demographic of 18-to-34-year-olds, “The Daily Show” draws almost twice as many viewers than “The Tonight Show,” according to Nielsen.

Mr. Johnson says the main reason younger viewers are changing the channel is the slow format of network late-night shows. Why spend 50 minutes waiting for a celebrity guest who might say something you haven’t heard before, he asks, when Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert reliably deliver winning political satire packed into 20 minutes?

“The format has essentially been unchanged since the early days of the ‘Tonight Show.’ The difference is now you have half a dozen people doing it,” says Johnson, who allows that there’s still some great comedy on late-night, like Fallon’s hilarious “Evolution of Mom Dancing With Michelle Obama.” But why tune in at night when you can catch the best clips on YouTube the next day?

“You can keep your eyes and ears on social media, and if you hear about something great you can look it up,” Johnson says. “You don’t have to sit there like it’s 1974 waiting for the great moment.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Snoozing through late-night TV
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/TV/2013/0723/Snoozing-through-late-night-TV
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe