Three reasons Republicans may not want to capture the Senate

Control of the Senate is the big prize in the November midterms. Increasingly, the Republicans’ prospects are looking good.

If Republicans do capture the Senate, isn’t that great for them? In many ways, yes. They’d get to set the Senate agenda, for starters. But winning also brings risks. Here are some:

2. Republicans will have a bigger part of the 'Washington dysfunction' narrative

Melinda Deslatte/AP
US Rep. Bill Cassidy (R) speaks to reporters after qualifying to run for the US Senate, Aug. 20, 2014, in Baton Rouge, La. Mr. Cassidy is seeking to keep Sen. Mary Landrieu (D) from a fourth term in office.

Democrats have tried hard to pound the “Do-Nothing Congress” for its failure to, well, get much done. They blame the Republican-controlled House as well as Republicans in the Senate, who have considerable power, even in the minority. But Republicans’ easy reply, for now, is that Democrats control the Senate – and that Sen. Harry Reid (D) of Nevada, the majority leader, seems to enjoy making life miserable for minority leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.

If the Republicans retake the Senate, their ability to blame Democrats for any continuing dysfunction will be greatly reduced.

2 of 3

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.